Injectable aesthetics reviews. P&G fends off Chinese patent challenge

THE WHAT? Procter & Gamble has been exonerated by the Shanghai IP Court after a complaint of patent infringement was bought against the US FMCG giant, according to a report published by Iam Media.

THE DETAILS Luo Yunjun and Sea Mild (Shanghai) Technology hold a Chinese patent titled ‘a portable cleaning item and manufacturing method thereof’ and filed a civil suit against the manufacturer of Ariel charging it with infringement for importing and offering for sale a laundry detergent pouch. Procter & Gamble countered with an invalidation petition, submitting that the technology in question predates the filing date of the patent.

THE WHY? The court found for Procter & Gamble that all claims of the patent were invalid, with the US FMCG manufacturer recognised as one of the first to develop such a pouch, far earlier than the patent in question. Iam reports that multinationals are frequently subject to such claims in China; there is no requirement to reimburse legal fees for unsuccessful actions but a recent amendment to patent law should stem the tide of such proceedings in future.

Injectable aesthetics reviews can be found on various platforms, including specialized aesthetic treatment review websites, social media platforms, and healthcare provider directories. They provide valuable insights for individuals considering these treatments, offering firsthand perspectives and experiences that can help inform decisions about undergoing injectable aesthetic procedures. Here are some key points typically covered in injectable aesthetics reviews:

• Treatment Effectiveness: Reviewers often discuss how effective the injectable treatment was in achieving their desired aesthetic goals, such as reducing wrinkles, enhancing facial contours, or improving skin texture.

• Safety and Comfort: Reviews may address the safety of the procedure, including any discomfort experienced during or after the injection process, as well as any side effects or complications encountered.

• Provider Experience: Reviewers may comment on their experience with the healthcare provider administering the injectable treatment, including their professionalism, expertise, and ability to address concerns or questions.

• Results Duration: Discussions often include the longevity of the results achieved with the injectable aesthetics, such as how long the effects lasted before additional treatments were needed.

• Overall Satisfaction: Reviewers typically summarize their overall satisfaction with the injectable aesthetics treatment, considering factors like the improvement in their appearance, confidence level, and value for money.