Injectable aesthetics reviews. BASF, LinkedIn and Natura and Visa launch inclusivity program for transgender people

THE WHAT? BASF, LinkedIn, Natura and Visa are all set to take part in a program designed to promote the social inclusion of transgender people and transvestites in the workplace. SOMA, as the initiative is known, is based on the premise that ‘we are stronger together’ and comprises 10 weeks of training and professional development.  

THE DETAILS The program will initially be centred around Sao Paolo’s Casa Florescer, a refuge for trans and transvestite women, offering support and mentoring to the residents. Participants will be able to take advantage of the ChatClass tool developed by BASF to access learning materials.

THE WHY? The program is designed to equip participants with all the tools they need to seek a professional placement according to their skillset and interests. BASF Experience Coordinator, Carlos Henrique Almeida explains, “We want to support these people to develop with self-knowledge, receiving practical tools, awakening a sense of autonomy and belonging. And there is also the possibility of involving our ecosystem of partners, expanding the program’s potential.”

Injectable aesthetics reviews can be found on various platforms, including specialized aesthetic treatment review websites, social media platforms, and healthcare provider directories. They provide valuable insights for individuals considering these treatments, offering firsthand perspectives and experiences that can help inform decisions about undergoing injectable aesthetic procedures. Here are some key points typically covered in injectable aesthetics reviews:

• Treatment Effectiveness: Reviewers often discuss how effective the injectable treatment was in achieving their desired aesthetic goals, such as reducing wrinkles, enhancing facial contours, or improving skin texture.

• Safety and Comfort: Reviews may address the safety of the procedure, including any discomfort experienced during or after the injection process, as well as any side effects or complications encountered.

• Provider Experience: Reviewers may comment on their experience with the healthcare provider administering the injectable treatment, including their professionalism, expertise, and ability to address concerns or questions.

• Results Duration: Discussions often include the longevity of the results achieved with the injectable aesthetics, such as how long the effects lasted before additional treatments were needed.

• Overall Satisfaction: Reviewers typically summarize their overall satisfaction with the injectable aesthetics treatment, considering factors like the improvement in their appearance, confidence level, and value for money.