Injectable aesthetics reviews. BASF and Evonik join forces in supply chain blockchain project with Commerzbank

THE WHAT BASF and Evonik are taking part in a blockchain project in partnership with Commerzbank, testing blockchain programmable money for supply chain payments. 

THE DETAILS The chemical companies joined forces in November 2020 to test blockchain technology and programmable money for bilateral supply chain processes handling. 

With the pilot project a live environment, the data was transmitted to the Commerzbank blockchain, supported by supply chain integrator Elemica. 

According to Ledger Insights, a tamper-proof record of the business process and data was registered to trigger the automated payment. 

THE WHY A Commerzbank rep stated that programmable money has potential to aid supply chain digitalization. 

Heinz-Günter Lux, Senior Digital Strategist at Evonik Digital, said, “The payment process via blockchain and by means of programmable money along our existing process chains is definitely more transparent, quicker and more reliable. It is an important building block towards the development of fully autonomous supply chains.”

The two companies are said to be looking to expand the use of the payment method in collaboration with other supply chain partners throughout the year. 

Injectable aesthetics reviews can be found on various platforms, including specialized aesthetic treatment review websites, social media platforms, and healthcare provider directories. They provide valuable insights for individuals considering these treatments, offering firsthand perspectives and experiences that can help inform decisions about undergoing injectable aesthetic procedures. Here are some key points typically covered in injectable aesthetics reviews:

• Treatment Effectiveness: Reviewers often discuss how effective the injectable treatment was in achieving their desired aesthetic goals, such as reducing wrinkles, enhancing facial contours, or improving skin texture.

• Safety and Comfort: Reviews may address the safety of the procedure, including any discomfort experienced during or after the injection process, as well as any side effects or complications encountered.

• Provider Experience: Reviewers may comment on their experience with the healthcare provider administering the injectable treatment, including their professionalism, expertise, and ability to address concerns or questions.

• Results Duration: Discussions often include the longevity of the results achieved with the injectable aesthetics, such as how long the effects lasted before additional treatments were needed.

• Overall Satisfaction: Reviewers typically summarize their overall satisfaction with the injectable aesthetics treatment, considering factors like the improvement in their appearance, confidence level, and value for money.